Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs NX-SoC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM20BCapsaicin
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2017 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed384 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed768 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.29268.8
Floating-point processing power0.3932 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1000 MBps
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.170
CUDA5.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 20 nm 28 nm

NX-SoC has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NX-SoC and Radeon R9 FURY X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NX-SoC is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 FURY X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
Radeon R9 FURY X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NX-SoC or Radeon R9 FURY X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.