NX-SoC vs Radeon R9 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking273not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.75no data
Power efficiency5.27no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameHawaiiGM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 November 2013 (11 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560256
Core clock speed947 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speedno data768 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate151.512.29
Floating-point processing power4.849 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 November 2013 17 March 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 15 Watt

NX-SoC has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 290 and NX-SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290 is a desktop card while NX-SoC is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 576 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290 or NX-SoC, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.