Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NX-SoC

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameGM20BiDG1LPDEV
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2017 (7 years ago)31 October 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25696
Core clock speed384 MHzno data
Boost clock speed768 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology20 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.2979.20
Floating-point performance393.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on NX-SoC and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4LPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz4266 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.3no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2017 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 20 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between NX-SoC and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NX-SoC is a desktop card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 221 vote

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.