ATI Radeon X1300 XT vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGM107RV530
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)12 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2no data
Core clock speed902 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×22.000
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×24
TMUs32 ×24
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×212.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2015 12 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 22 Watt

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1300 XT, on the other hand, has 209% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and Radeon X1300 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1300 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 51 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Radeon X1300 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.