Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.10no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2768
Core clock speed902 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×297.92
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×23.133 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×232
TMUs32 ×248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×232 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×264 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2015 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 25 Watt

Pro W6300M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 172% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.