ATI FireGL V7350 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking826not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.21no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGM107R520
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2no data
Core clock speed902 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×29.600
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×216
TMUs32 ×216
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×241.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2015 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 111 Watt

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 63.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
ATI FireGL V7350
FireGL V7350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.