Extreme Graphics vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking808not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.16no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 2.0 (2002−2003)
GPU code nameGM107Brookdale
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2no data
Core clock speed902 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Wattno data
Texture fill rate33.06 ×20.2
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×21
TMUs32 ×21

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16FSB
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1188
+118700%
Extreme Graphics 1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

NVS 810 has a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and Extreme Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Extreme Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
Intel Extreme Graphics
Extreme Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate Extreme Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Extreme Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.