Radeon RX 640 vs NVS 5400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5400M with Radeon RX 640, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5400M
2012
2 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.62

RX 640 outperforms NVS 5400M by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking956616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.237.29
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Polaris 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96640
Core clock speed660 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors585 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate10.5648.72
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPS1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXMPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 5400M 1.62
RX 640 5.23
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5400M 625
RX 640 2017
+223%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

NVS 5400M 1119
RX 640 5235
+368%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 5400M 5198
RX 640 14141
+172%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−66.7%
25
+66.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−233%
20
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−38.2%
45−50
+38.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−38.2%
45−50
+38.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−106%
30−35
+106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−38.2%
45−50
+38.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how NVS 5400M and RX 640 compete in popular games:

  • RX 640 is 67% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the NVS 5400M is 9% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 640 is 767% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 5400M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RX 640 is ahead in 50 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.62 5.23
Recency 1 June 2012 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 5400M has 42.9% lower power consumption.

RX 640, on the other hand, has a 222.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 640 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5400M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 640 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 46 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 255 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.