GeForce Go 7600 vs NVS 5400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5400M with GeForce Go 7600, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5400M
2012
2 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.55
+384%

NVS 5400M outperforms Go 7600 by a whopping 384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9661318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.18no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF108G73
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9613
Core clock speed660 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistors585 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.563.600
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXMPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 5400M 1.55
+384%
Go 7600 0.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5400M 622
+390%
Go 7600 127

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
+600%
2−3
−600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
World of Tanks 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how NVS 5400M and Go 7600 compete in popular games:

  • NVS 5400M is 600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the NVS 5400M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • NVS 5400M is ahead in 27 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 0.32
Recency 1 June 2012 1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

NVS 5400M has a 384.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 5400M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce Go 7600 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
GeForce Go 7600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 47 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5400M or GeForce Go 7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.