Radeon 620 vs NVS 5200M
Aggregated performance score
Radeon 620 outperforms NVS 5200M by an impressive 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 980 | 810 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.09 | 0.34 |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
GPU code name | N13M-NS | Polaris 24 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 (11 years ago) | 12 August 2019 (4 years ago) |
Current price | $139 | $67 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Radeon 620 has 278% better value for money than NVS 5200M.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1024 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 10.00 | 24.58 |
Floating-point performance | 258.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on NVS 5200M and Radeon 620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | MXM | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon 620 outperforms NVS 5200M by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon 620 outperforms NVS 5200M by 75% in Passmark.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Radeon 620 outperforms NVS 5200M by 146% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 11
−63.6%
| 18−20
+63.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−22.2%
|
10−12
+22.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
This is how NVS 5200M and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:
- Radeon 620 is 64% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 620 is 400% faster than the NVS 5200M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 620 is ahead in 28 tests (88%)
- there's a draw in 4 tests (13%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.32 | 2.32 |
Recency | 1 June 2012 | 12 August 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5200M in performance tests.
Be aware that NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 620 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.