RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVS 4200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 4200M and RTX A5000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 4200M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 25 Watt
0.68

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms NVS 4200M by a whopping 5200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1203129
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.1919.32
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF119GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486144
Core clock speed810 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors292 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate6.480302.4
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache64 KB6 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXMPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 4200M 0.68
RTX A5000 Mobile 36.04
+5200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 4200M Samples: 1423 301
RTX A5000 Mobile Samples: 286 15936
+5194%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

NVS 4200M 507
RTX A5000 Mobile 36164
+7033%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−715%
106
+715%
1440p1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
4K0−148

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2860%
140−150
+2860%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%
Valorant 27−30
−676%
220−230
+676%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1290%
270−280
+1290%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Dota 2 12−14
−915%
132
+915%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90
+8900%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2860%
140−150
+2860%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2400%
150
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−676%
220−230
+676%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%
Dota 2 12−14
−854%
124
+854%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2860%
140−150
+2860%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
Valorant 27−30
−676%
220−230
+676%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−8833%
260−270
+8833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5350%
100−110
+5350%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10000%
100−110
+10000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
76
+407%
Valorant 4−5
−5750%
230−240
+5750%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how NVS 4200M and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 715% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 6700% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 10000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile performs better in 37 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 36.04
Recency 22 February 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

NVS 4200M has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 5200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 171 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 70 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 4200M or RTX A5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.