GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVS 315

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 315 with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

NVS 315
2013
1 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
0.90

RTX 4070 outperforms NVS 315 by a whopping 7663% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking108817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0226.85
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGF119AD104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 March 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $599
Current price$213 (1.3x MSRP)$791 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 has 134150% better value for money than NVS 315.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485888
Core clock speed523 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors292 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate4.184455.4
Floating-point performance100.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm240 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 315 0.90
RTX 4070 69.87
+7663%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms NVS 315 by 7663% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 315 346
RTX 4070 26985
+7699%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms NVS 315 by 7699% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−10250%
207
+10250%
1440p1−2
−12100%
122
+12100%
4K0−173

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 216
−7655%
16750−16800
+7655%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−7648%
8600−8650
+7648%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−7624%
9500−9550
+7624%
Battlefield 5 220−230
−7646%
17350−17400
+7646%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−7631%
9200−9250
+7631%
Cyberpunk 2077 174
−7659%
13500−13550
+7659%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−7635%
9050−9100
+7635%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
−7649%
13250−13300
+7649%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−7652%
16900−16950
+7652%
Hitman 3 120−130
−7646%
9450−9500
+7646%
Horizon Zero Dawn 470
−7655%
36450−36500
+7655%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−7643%
11150−11200
+7643%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−7642%
9600−9650
+7642%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 482
−7659%
37400−37450
+7659%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−7641%
10450−10500
+7641%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−7648%
8600−8650
+7648%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−7624%
9500−9550
+7624%
Battlefield 5 220−230
−7646%
17350−17400
+7646%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−7631%
9200−9250
+7631%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
−7662%
11100−11150
+7662%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−7635%
9050−9100
+7635%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
−7649%
13250−13300
+7649%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−7652%
16900−16950
+7652%
Hitman 3 120−130
−7646%
9450−9500
+7646%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
−7663%
22900−22950
+7663%
Metro Exodus 84
−7638%
6500−6550
+7638%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−7642%
9600−9650
+7642%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 376
−7653%
29150−29200
+7653%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 351
−7649%
27200−27250
+7649%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−7641%
10450−10500
+7641%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−7648%
8600−8650
+7648%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−7624%
9500−9550
+7624%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−7631%
9200−9250
+7631%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
−7634%
9900−9950
+7634%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−7635%
9050−9100
+7635%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−7652%
16900−16950
+7652%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
−7647%
22700−22750
+7647%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 322
−7648%
24950−25000
+7648%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
−7635%
13150−13200
+7635%
Watch Dogs: Legion 124
−7642%
9600−9650
+7642%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
−7642%
9600−9650
+7642%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
−7658%
12800−12850
+7658%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−7643%
11150−11200
+7643%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−7644%
6350−6400
+7644%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
−7659%
6750−6800
+7659%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−7636%
8200−8250
+7636%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
−7616%
6250−6300
+7616%
Far Cry 5 171
−7649%
13250−13300
+7649%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−7638%
13000−13050
+7638%
Hitman 3 100−110
−7645%
7900−7950
+7645%
Horizon Zero Dawn 222
−7648%
17200−17250
+7648%
Metro Exodus 143
−7662%
11100−11150
+7662%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
−7648%
17200−17250
+7648%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−7656%
9850−9900
+7656%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
−7642%
7200−7250
+7642%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−7639%
8900−8950
+7639%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−7627%
6800−6850
+7627%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−7654%
5350−5400
+7654%
Hitman 3 60−65
−7605%
4700−4750
+7605%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−7657%
8300−8350
+7657%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
−7638%
6500−6550
+7638%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
−7639%
8900−8950
+7639%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−7659%
4500−4550
+7659%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−7627%
4250−4300
+7627%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−7592%
4000−4050
+7592%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−7539%
2750−2800
+7539%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−7600%
3850−3900
+7600%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−7627%
9350−9400
+7627%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130
−7631%
10050−10100
+7631%
Metro Exodus 96
−7660%
7450−7500
+7660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
−7600%
3850−3900
+7600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−7663%
5900−5950
+7663%

This is how NVS 315 and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 10250% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 12100% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 69.87
Recency 10 March 2013 13 April 2023
Cost $159 $599
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 200 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 315 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 315 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 315
NVS 315
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 162 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7626 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.