Radeon RX 7600M vs NVS 3100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 3100M with Radeon RX 7600M, including specs and performance data.

NVS 3100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.50

RX 7600M outperforms NVS 3100M by a whopping 5558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1264213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5722.62
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161792
Core clock speed606 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2410 MHz
Number of transistors260 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate4.848269.9
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 3100M 0.50
RX 7600M 28.29
+5558%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204
RX 7600M 11581
+5577%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 3100M 1121
RX 7600M 77136
+6784%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−8400%
85
+8400%
1440p0−143
4K-0−123

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2675%
110−120
+2675%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%
Valorant 27−30
−578%
180−190
+578%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1494%
270−280
+1494%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Dota 2 10−12
−1091%
130−140
+1091%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2675%
110−120
+2675%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2660%
138
+2660%
Valorant 27−30
−578%
180−190
+578%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Dota 2 10−12
−1091%
130−140
+1091%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2675%
110−120
+2675%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1780%
94
+1780%
Valorant 27−30
−578%
180−190
+578%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−19500%
190−200
+19500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 27−30
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 30

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 65−70

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
Valorant 3−4
−5500%
160−170
+5500%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18
+0%
18
+0%

This is how NVS 3100M and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is 8400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M is 19500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 28.29
Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 90 Watt

NVS 3100M has 542.9% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M, on the other hand, has a 5558% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 139 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 3100M or Radeon RX 7600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.