ION vs NVS 3100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 3100M with ION, including specs and performance data.

NVS 3100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.49
+88.5%

3100M outperforms ION by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13021424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.701.00
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218C79
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed606 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors260 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8483.600
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 3100M 0.49
+88.5%
ION 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204
+88.9%
Samples: 1517
ION 108
Samples: 461

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.26
Recency 7 January 2010 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 20 Watt

NVS 3100M has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 43% lower power consumption.

The NVS 3100M is our recommended choice as it beats the ION in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while ION is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 156 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 23 votes

Rate ION on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 3100M or ION, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.