GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs NVS 3100M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.59no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218G80
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16112
Core clock speed606 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.84828.00
Floating-point processing power0.04698 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB640 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 150 Watt

NVS 3100M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 971.4% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 112, on the other hand, has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 3100M and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 128 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 308 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.