Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVS 310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 310 and Radeon Pro W6400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 310
2012
512 MB DDR3, 20 Watt
0.65

Pro W6400 outperforms NVS 310 by a whopping 2863% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1223308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.4829.36
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF119Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 June 2012 (13 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed523 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistors292 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.184111.9
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache64 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length156 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 310 0.65
Pro W6400 19.26
+2863%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 310 Samples: 404 274
Pro W6400 Samples: 99 8071
+2846%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 19.26
Recency 26 June 2012 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 310 has 150% lower power consumption.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has a 2863.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 310 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 310
NVS 310
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 92 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 310 or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.