Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVS 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.86
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGT218GM200
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 January 2011 (13 years ago)5 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163072
Core clock speed520 MHz988 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1114 MHz
Number of transistors260 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160285.2
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS6.844 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s317.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.25.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 300 121
M6000 24 GB 11882
+9720%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2011 5 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 300 has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

M6000 24 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 300 and Quadro M6000 24 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 300
NVS 300
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 44 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.