Tesla C2090 vs NVS 2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1363not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.30no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGT218GF110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16512
Core clock speed535 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors260 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.28041.66
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs864
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.22.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 2100M has 2172.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 2100M and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Tesla C2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 2100M or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.