Radeon R7 M465X vs NVS 2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 2100M with Radeon R7 M465X, including specs and performance data.

NVS 2100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.33

R7 M465X outperforms 2100M by a whopping 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1375721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.31no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Tropo
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)15 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16512
Core clock speed535 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors260 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.28029.60
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 2100M 0.33
R7 M465X 4.27
+1194%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M 136
Samples: 64
R7 M465X 1786
+1213%
Samples: 15

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Valorant 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1186%
180−190
+1186%
Valorant 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 4.27
Recency 7 January 2010 15 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R7 M465X has a 1194% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M465X is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M465X is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 2100M or Radeon R7 M465X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.