RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs NVS 2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 2100M with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

NVS 2100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.31

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms NVS 2100M by a whopping 32158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2726.81
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT218GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1614080
Core clock speed535 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors260 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2801,151
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS73.69 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.212.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 2100M 0.31
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 100.00
+32158%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M Samples: 63 139
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Samples: 1 45357
+32531%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−31150%
1250−1300
+31150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
Valorant 24−27
−32015%
8350−8400
+32015%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−32043%
4500−4550
+32043%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Dota 2 10−11
−31900%
3200−3250
+31900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−31150%
1250−1300
+31150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
Valorant 24−27
−32015%
8350−8400
+32015%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Dota 2 10−11
−31900%
3200−3250
+31900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−31150%
1250−1300
+31150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−32043%
2250−2300
+32043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−31900%
1600−1650
+31900%
Valorant 24−27
−32015%
8350−8400
+32015%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−31567%
950−1000
+31567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−31900%
4800−4850
+31900%
Valorant 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 100.00
Recency 7 January 2010 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 300 Watt

NVS 2100M has 2627.3% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 32158.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 80 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 2100M or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.