GeForce 9200 vs NVS 2100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 2100M with GeForce 9200, including specs and performance data.

NVS 2100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.32

9200 outperforms 2100M by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13641318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.260.78
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT218C78
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed535 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors260 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2804.000
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 2100M 0.32
GeForce 9200 0.40
+25%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M 136
Samples: 64
GeForce 9200 168
+23.5%
Samples: 257

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.40
Recency 7 January 2010 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 40 Watt

NVS 2100M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 263.6% lower power consumption.

GeForce 9200, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce 9200 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 2100M or GeForce 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.