GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs ATI Mobility Radeon

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility
2001
16 MB DDR
1.18

RTX 2080 Super outperforms Mobility by a whopping 3844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.60
Power efficiencyno data14.33
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM6TU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 December 2001 (24 years ago)23 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed144 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors30 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.43348.5
Floating-point processing powerno data11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs3192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed144 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.304 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility 1.18
RTX 2080 Super 46.54
+3844%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

ATI Mobility 690
RTX 2080 Super 27398
+3871%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
1440p2−3
−4500%
92
+4500%
4K1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.07
1440pno data7.60
4Kno data9.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 253
+0%
253
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 143
+0%
143
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 173
+0%
173
+0%
Valorant 301
+0%
301
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Fortnite 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 113
+0%
113
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 168
+0%
168
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 195
+0%
195
+0%
Valorant 283
+0%
283
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+0%
133
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 159
+0%
159
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 217
+0%
217
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180
+0%
180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 273
+0%
273
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+0%
57
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 117
+0%
117
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 127
+0%
127
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+0%
115
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 262
+0%
262
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+0%
31
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 68
+0%
68
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 64
+0%
64
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super is 4500% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 4500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super is 6900% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 46.54
Recency 1 December 2001 23 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm

RTX 2080 Super has a 3844% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3088 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon or GeForce RTX 2080 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.