RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated72
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.53
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM58no data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2006 (19 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed550 MHzno data
Number of transistors321 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate8.800no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2006 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 17 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1800 XT and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1800 XT is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 XT
Mobility Radeon X1800 XT
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 10 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X1800 XT or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.