GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM52TU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 January 2006 (19 years ago)10 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61920
Core clock speed350 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors107 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data160 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data6.451 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2006 10 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

RTX 2060 TU104 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1300 and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1300 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
Mobility Radeon X1300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 102 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X1300 or GeForce RTX 2060 TU104, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.