GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data43.74
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM11GP108B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2004 (21 years ago)20 February 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6384
Core clock speed450 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistors76 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80024.91
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7972 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs424
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2004 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9700 and GeForce MX250. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1720 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9700 or GeForce MX250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.