GeForce GTX 1650 vs Mobility Radeon X1300
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 253 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 2 |
| Value for money | no data | 19.04 |
| Architecture | R500 (2005−2007) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | M52 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 January 2006 (18 years ago) | 23 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $149 |
| Current price | $50 | $185 (1.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 350 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 107 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.400 | 93.24 |
Size and compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon X1300 and GeForce GTX 1650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 229 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 19 January 2006 | 23 April 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1300 and GeForce GTX 1650. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1300 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
