RTX PRO 6000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire
2010
2x1 GB DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5, 120 Watt
4.69

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.000.84
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameBroadway-XTGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160024064
Core clock speed700 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2x1 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Full HD54
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Fortnite 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Valorant 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−34.1%
110−120
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Dota 2 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Fortnite 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Dota 2 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 60−65
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Valorant 50−55
−37.3%
70−75
+37.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 32% faster in 900p
  • RTX PRO 6000 is 39% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.69 6.57
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 600 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 69 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.