GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5850 with GeForce RTX 2080 Super, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2080 Super outperforms Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 2575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 981 | 87 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 25.60 |
| Power efficiency | 4.47 | 14.33 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Broadway | TU104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (16 years ago) | 23 July 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 800 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1815 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,040 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 348.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.8 TFLOPS | 11.15 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 40 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1937 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 495.9 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 19
−2532%
| 500−550
+2532%
|
| Full HD | 25
−452%
| 138
+452%
|
| 1440p | 3−4
−2967%
| 92
+2967%
|
| 4K | 2−3
−3400%
| 70
+3400%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 5.07 |
| 1440p | no data | 7.60 |
| 4K | no data | 9.99 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−12400%
|
250−260
+12400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2725%
|
110−120
+2725%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 1−2
−13200%
|
130−140
+13200%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−2950%
|
122
+2950%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−12400%
|
250−260
+12400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2725%
|
110−120
+2725%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−2625%
|
109
+2625%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
−3514%
|
253
+3514%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1330%
|
143
+1330%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−4800%
|
140−150
+4800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1473%
|
173
+1473%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−714%
|
301
+714%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−2650%
|
110
+2650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−12400%
|
250−260
+12400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−654%
|
270−280
+654%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2725%
|
110−120
+2725%
|
| Dota 2 | 20−22
−590%
|
138
+590%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−2525%
|
105
+2525%
|
| Fortnite | 7−8
−2543%
|
185
+2543%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1320%
|
142
+1320%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−4800%
|
140−150
+4800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−5550%
|
113
+5550%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−3000%
|
93
+3000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1427%
|
168
+1427%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−2338%
|
195
+2338%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−665%
|
283
+665%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−3175%
|
131
+3175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2125%
|
89
+2125%
|
| Dota 2 | 20−22
−545%
|
129
+545%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−2550%
|
106
+2550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−1230%
|
133
+1230%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1345%
|
159
+1345%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1263%
|
109
+1263%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−486%
|
217
+486%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 7−8
−2471%
|
180
+2471%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−2440%
|
120−130
+2440%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−2692%
|
300−350
+2692%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−872%
|
170−180
+872%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−2630%
|
273
+2630%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−5600%
|
57
+5600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−2825%
|
117
+2825%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−4133%
|
127
+4133%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−721%
|
115
+721%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−3175%
|
262
+3175%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−3767%
|
116
+3767%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 61 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 81 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−2167%
|
68
+2167%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2033%
|
64
+2033%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 108
+0%
|
108
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 79
+0%
|
79
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 68
+0%
|
68
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 5850 and RTX 2080 Super compete in popular games:
- RTX 2080 Super is 2532% faster in 900p
- RTX 2080 Super is 452% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2080 Super is 2967% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2080 Super is 3400% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 13200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2080 Super performs better in 49 tests (84%)
- there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.74 | 46.54 |
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 23 July 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 5850 has 733% lower power consumption.
RTX 2080 Super, on the other hand, has a 2575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
