GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5830 with GeForce4 Ti 4400, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5830
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 24 Watt
1.23
+6050%

Mobility HD 5830 outperforms Ti 4400 by a whopping 6050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10941565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameBroadwayNV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed500 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.002.200
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data216 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 0−1
Valorant 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.02
Recency 7 January 2010 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 5830 has a 6050% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5830 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 84 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5830 or GeForce4 Ti 4400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.