Radeon 660M vs ATI Mobility HD 5730

Place in the ranking	984	329
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.94	28.39
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Madison	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	384
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1900 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	45.60
Floating-point processing power	0.52 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	20	24
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5730 1.47

Radeon 660M 16.29
+1008%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5730 3809

Radeon 660M 23222
+510%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	14 −971%	150−160 +971%
Full HD	18 −33.3%	24 +33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−500%

24
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −260%	50−55 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −300%	30−35 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −87.9%	60−65 +87.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −250%	14 +250%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −260%	50−55 +260%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −313%	33 +313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −87.9%	60−65 +87.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Hitman 3	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −46.7%	22 +46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −238%	27 +238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −36.4%	15 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −87.9%	60−65 +87.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1250%

27−30
+1250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Hitman 3	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −786%	60−65 +786%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−300%

16−18
+300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−600%

7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	0−1	5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−200%

9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 +0%	26 +0%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +0%	19 +0%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Hitman 3	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5730 and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

Radeon 660M is 971% faster in 900p
Radeon 660M is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 660M is 2067% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 660M is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.47	16.29
Recency	7 January 2010	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	40 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5730 has 53.8% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has a 1008.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5730 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.