GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Mobility Radeon HD 5730

Place in performance ranking	955	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	17.30
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Madison	Ampere GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,999
Current price	no data	$1251 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	10752
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1560 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1860 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.00	625.0
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5730 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	14 −5257%	750−800 +5257%
Full HD	18 −1067%	210 +1067%
1440p	2−3 −6900%	140 +6900%
4K	1−2 −10000%	101 +10000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−5375%

219
+5375%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	110−120
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1680%	170−180 +1680%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −4925%	201 +4925%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21600%	210−220 +21600%
Hitman 3	2−3 −10700%	210−220 +10700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −16800%	160−170 +16800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3686%	265 +3686%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	110−120
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −1680%	170−180 +1680%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −4225%	173 +4225%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21600%	210−220 +21600%
Hitman 3	2−3 −10700%	210−220 +10700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −16800%	160−170 +16800%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −8800%	178 +8800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3486%	251 +3486%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −9750%	394 +9750%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	110−120
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3700%	152 +3700%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −21600%	210−220 +21600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4725%	193 +4725%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4600%	140−150 +4600%
Hitman 3	4−5 −4300%	170−180 +4300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1575%	130−140 +1575%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	75−80
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −3580%	184 +3580%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −10300%	104 +10300%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −7300%	140−150 +7300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −7250%	140−150 +7250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4350%	85−90 +4350%
Hitman 3	1−2 −10300%	100−110 +10300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1200%	90−95 +1200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	50−55

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	60−65
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	73
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3067%	95−100 +3067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1780%	90−95 +1780%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5730 and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is 5257% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5730 in 900p
RTX 3090 Ti is 1067% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5730 in 1080p
RTX 3090 Ti is 6900% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5730 in 1440p
RTX 3090 Ti is 10000% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5730 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 21600% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 5730.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3090 Ti surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5730 in all 32 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.40	76.85
Recency	7 January 2010	27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	450 Watt