GRID K240Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.59
Power efficiencyno data2.08
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM96GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201536
Core clock speed675 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors514 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6095.36
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs32128
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2010 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 225 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 565v has 1025% lower power consumption.

GRID K240Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 565v and GRID K240Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 565v is a notebook graphics card while GRID K240Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 565v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 565v or GRID K240Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.