Radeon RX 6650M vs ATI Mobility HD 5650

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Radeon RX 6650M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5650
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
1.40

RX 6650M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 2705% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1006116
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4022.42
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMadisonNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001792
Core clock speed450 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors627 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000270.6
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5650 1.40
RX 6650M 39.27
+2705%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI Mobility HD 5650 856
RX 6650M 32846
+3739%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

ATI Mobility HD 5650 730
RX 6650M 25739
+3426%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Full HD16
−656%
121
+656%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3075%
127
+3075%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−980%
160−170
+980%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−288%
120−130
+288%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1875%
79
+1875%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−980%
160−170
+980%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2275%
190
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−288%
120−130
+288%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1500%
64
+1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−980%
160−170
+980%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1988%
167
+1988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−87.9%
62
+87.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−2629%
190−200
+2629%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 0−1 21−24

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 2567% faster in 900p
  • RX 6650M is 656% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M is 7400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 39.27
Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has 700% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M, on the other hand, has a 2705% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 264 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 127 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.