Radeon HD 4650 vs Mobility HD 5650

Place in performance ranking	969	1159
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Madison Pro	RV730
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	10 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$24	$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	320
Core clock speed	450 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	627 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15-19 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	19.20
Floating-point performance	360.0 gflops	384.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Radeon HD 4650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	193 mm
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.0	4.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	15 +150%	6−7 −150%
Full HD	17 +143%	7−8 −143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+200%

1−2

−200%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and ATI HD 4650 compete in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 150% faster in 900p
ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 143% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.37	0.62
Recency	7 January 2010	10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	48 Watt