Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Place in the ranking	1012	225
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.75	23.66
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Madison	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	1792
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1139 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1404 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	157.2
Floating-point processing power	0.36 TFLOPS	5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	20	112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	168.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	15 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
Full HD	17 −1606%	290−300 +1606%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−1650%

70−75
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1650%	140−150 +1650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1567%	550−600 +1567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1650%	140−150 +1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1627%	190−200 +1627%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1567%	550−600 +1567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1650%	140−150 +1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1627%	190−200 +1627%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1567%	550−600 +1567%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1650%

70−75
+1650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1500%

16−18
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1567%

50−55
+1567%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

P3200 Max-Q is 1633% faster in 900p
P3200 Max-Q is 1606% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.38	24.18
Recency	7 January 2010	21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has 400% lower power consumption.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1652.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.