Arc A530M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5650
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
1.33

Arc A530M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 1341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1053315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.2720.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameMadisonDG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001536
Core clock speed450 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors627 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000124.8
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2096
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−1300%
210−220
+1300%
Full HD16
−1338%
230−240
+1338%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Fortnite 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Valorant 30−35
−315%
140−150
+315%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
−485%
220−230
+485%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Dota 2 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Fortnite 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−6800%
65−70
+6800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
Valorant 30−35
−315%
140−150
+315%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Dota 2 16−18
−1312%
240−250
+1312%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−986%
75−80
+986%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%
Valorant 30−35
−315%
140−150
+315%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 35−40
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−1588%
130−140
+1588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2013%
160−170
+2013%
Valorant 5−6
−3440%
170−180
+3440%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 7−8
−1400%
100−110
+1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Dota 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 1300% faster in 900p
  • Arc A530M is 1338% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A530M is 7700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is ahead in 45 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 19.16
Recency 7 January 2010 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 1340.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 275 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 209 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5650 or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.