Radeon Sky 500 vs ATI Mobility HD 560v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 560v with Radeon Sky 500, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 560v
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.81

Sky 500 outperforms Mobility HD 560v by a whopping 1294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1202459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.165.80
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameM96Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2010 (16 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201280
Core clock speed550 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors514 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6076.00
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
L1 Cache64 KB320 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s154 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Valorant 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Dota 2 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Dota 2 12−14
−1285%
180−190
+1285%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Valorant 30−33
−1233%
400−450
+1233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Valorant 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 11.29
Recency 5 May 2010 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 560v has 900% lower power consumption.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has a 1294% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Sky 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 560v in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 560v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 560v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 560v or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.