ATI Radeon 9800 XT vs ATI Mobility HD 550v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 550v with Radeon 9800 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 550v
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.73
+462%

Mobility HD 550v outperforms 9800 XT by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12251497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.620.17
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameM96R360
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed450 MHz412 MHz
Number of transistors514 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate14.403.296
Floating-point processing power0.288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs328
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz365 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s23.36 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+567%
3−4
−567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how ATI Mobility HD 550v and ATI 9800 XT compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 550v is 567% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.13
Recency 5 May 2010 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 550v has a 461.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 172.7% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9800 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 550v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
ATI Radeon 9800 XT
Radeon 9800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 550v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 25 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 550v or Radeon 9800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.