GeForce RTX 2060 vs Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 4645% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1111 | 122 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 23 |
| Value for money | no data | 21.02 |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 (2008−2010) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | M96 | Turing TU106 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
| Current price | $56 | $397 (1.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1620 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 514 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 14.40 | 201.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon HD 550v and GeForce RTX 2060 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 229 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 4645% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 2631% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 20
−505%
| 121
+505%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−7500%
| 76
+7500%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−4900%
| 50
+4900%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2033%
|
60−65
+2033%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−1588%
|
135
+1588%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2033%
|
60−65
+2033%
|
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−3300%
|
102
+3300%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1683%
|
107
+1683%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−1375%
|
118
+1375%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2033%
|
60−65
+2033%
|
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−6600%
|
67
+6600%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−1767%
|
56
+1767%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1500%
|
96
+1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−4433%
|
136
+4433%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2033%
|
60−65
+2033%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−2333%
|
73
+2333%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2433%
|
76
+2433%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−2133%
|
65−70
+2133%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−550%
|
52
+550%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−1250%
|
50−55
+1250%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−6500%
|
65−70
+6500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−5000%
|
50−55
+5000%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−4200%
|
43
+4200%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−3500%
|
35−40
+3500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−114%
|
15
+114%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1267%
|
41
+1267%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−740%
|
42
+740%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 550v and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:
- RTX 2060 is 505% faster than ATI Mobility HD 550v in 1080p
- RTX 2060 is 7500% faster than ATI Mobility HD 550v in 1440p
- RTX 2060 is 4900% faster than ATI Mobility HD 550v in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 6600% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 550v.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 2060 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 550v in all 25 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.77 | 36.54 |
| Recency | 5 May 2010 | 6 January 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 175 Watt |
The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 550v in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 550v is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
