Radeon RX 640 vs ATI Mobility HD 5470

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5470 and Radeon RX 640, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5470
2010
512 MB GDDR5, 15 Watt
0.61

RX 640 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5470 by a whopping 743% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1193616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.827.14
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameParkPolaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80640
Core clock speed750 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors292 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00048.72
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 0.61
RX 640 5.14
+743%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 236
RX 640 1983
+740%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 1270
RX 640 14141
+1014%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−800%
27
+800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−200%
30−35
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−200%
30−35
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Hitman 3 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−200%
30−35
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−10%
11
+10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hitman 3 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5470 and RX 640 compete in popular games:

  • RX 640 is 800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 640 is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 640 is ahead in 35 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 5.14
Recency 7 January 2010 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5470 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 640, on the other hand, has a 742.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 245 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 255 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.