ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs ATI Mobility HD 5470

Place in the ranking	1206	1232
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.84	0.77
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Park	RV730
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	10 September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	320
Core clock speed	750 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.000	19.20
Floating-point processing power	0.12 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.0	4.1
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 0.61
+15.1%

ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.53

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 236
+14%

ATI HD 4650 AGP 207

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Fortnite	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
World of Tanks	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
World of Tanks	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Valorant	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Dota 2	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Valorant	1−2	0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.61	0.53
Recency	7 January 2010	10 September 2008
Chip lithography	40 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	48 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5470 has a 15.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.