UHD Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 545v and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 545v
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.38

UHD Graphics outperforms ATI Mobility HD 545v by a whopping 1368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281614
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Power efficiency1.7438.36
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameM93Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed680 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44012.00
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Valorant 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Valorant 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Valorant 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Valorant 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 5.58
Recency 5 May 2010 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 1368.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 545v in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 545v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7192 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 545v or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.