UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 540v and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 540v
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.34
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
2021
4 Watt
2.12
+524%

Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms Mobility HD 540v by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359924
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7516.32
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameM92Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2010 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8024
Core clock speed550 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−550%
13
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−207%
40−45
+207%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−70%
17
+70%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4
−25%
Valorant 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 540v and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 550% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 540v is 25% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 540v performs better in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) performs better in 25 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 2.12
Recency 5 May 2010 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 524% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 540v in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 540v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 60 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 540v or UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.