RTX A1000 Embedded vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 540v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 540v with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 540v
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.34

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms Mobility HD 540v by a whopping 7644% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7557.93
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM92GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802048
Core clock speed550 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1140 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40072.96
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache16 KB2 MB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Valorant 24−27
−7592%
2000−2050
+7592%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 10−11
−7400%
750−800
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 24−27
−7592%
2000−2050
+7592%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 10−11
−7400%
750−800
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 24−27
−7592%
2000−2050
+7592%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Valorant 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 26.33
Recency 5 May 2010 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 540v has 133% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 7644% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 540v in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 540v is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 10 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 540v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 27 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 540v or RTX A1000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.