Quadro4 900 XGL vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5165 with Quadro4 900 XGL, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5165
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.01
+10000%

Mobility HD 5165 outperforms Quadro4 900 XGL by a whopping 10000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11541584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.22no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameM96NV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)19 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors514 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.202.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs328
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s10.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.01
Recency 7 January 2010 19 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 5165 has a 10000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 900 XGL in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 900 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Quadro4 900 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 900 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5165 or Quadro4 900 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.