GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5165 with GeForce 9400 GT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5165
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.01
+115%

Mobility HD 5165 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11561309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.220.72
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameM96G96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)27 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed600 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors514 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate19.204.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Valorant 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.47
Recency 7 January 2010 27 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5165 has a 114.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
GeForce 9400 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 533 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5165 or GeForce 9400 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.