RTX A1000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.41

RTX A1000 outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 6188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1326251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.1039.70
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM92GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)16 April 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802304
Core clock speed720 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1462 MHz
Number of transistors242 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760105.3
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs872
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cache16 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
Valorant 24−27
−6054%
1600−1650
+6054%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−5900%
900−950
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 10−11
−5900%
600−650
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−6054%
1600−1650
+6054%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Dota 2 10−11
−5900%
600−650
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%
Valorant 24−27
−6054%
1600−1650
+6054%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5900%
180−190
+5900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5971%
850−900
+5971%
Valorant 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 25.78
Recency 7 January 2010 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has 233% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has a 6188% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 588% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 71 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.