Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.40

Graphics MAX outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 1010% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1327707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.0513.65
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameM92DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80768
Core clock speed720 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76079.20
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Valorant 27−30
−974%
290−300
+974%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−967%
160−170
+967%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−974%
290−300
+974%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 10−11
−1000%
110−120
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Valorant 27−30
−974%
290−300
+974%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Valorant 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 4.44
Recency 7 January 2010 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has a 1010% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 251 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.