Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2
2009
1 GB GDDR5
3.11

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking754525
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Power efficiencyno data18.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameM98Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80080
Core clock speed550 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate22.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.88 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 3.11
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57
+143%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 8396
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+159%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+132%
19
−132%
1440p4−5
−150%
10
+150%
4K5−6
−180%
14
+180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Hitman 3 8−9
−100%
16
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−87%
40−45
+87%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−850%
38
+850%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−92.3%
24−27
+92.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−55%
62
+55%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−267%
21−24
+267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Hitman 3 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−87%
40−45
+87%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−575%
27
+575%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−84.6%
24
+84.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−22.5%
49
+22.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−188%
45−50
+188%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+27.3%
11
−27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hitman 3 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 is 132% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 150% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 180% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 is 44% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 60 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 7.57
Recency 9 January 2009 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 143.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 901 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.