GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4830 4850 4850 Mac Edition 4850 X2 4860 4870 4870 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2
2009
1 GB GDDR5
2.85

775M Mac Edition outperforms Mobility HD 4870 X2 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility HD 4870 X2
GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking818803
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.36
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM98GK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800 ×21344
Core clock speed550 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors956 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate22.00 ×289.26
Floating-point processing power0.88 TFLOPS ×22.142 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×232
TMUs40 ×2112
L1 Cache160 KB112 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s ×2160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 2% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.85 3.04
Recency 9 January 2009 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

GTX 775M Mac Edition has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
9800M GTX SLI GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
GeForce 930MX GeForce 930MX
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
R9 M365X AMD R9 M365X
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
R9 M365X AMD R9 M365X
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q
R9 M365X AMD R9 M365X
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU 14-Core GPU
R9 M365X AMD R9 M365X
vs
K2000M Embedded K2000M Embedded
R9 M365X AMD R9 M365X
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU 30-Core GPU
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
Quadro4 550 XGL 550 XGL
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile 4050 Mobile
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
RTX 4090 Max-Q 4090 Max-Q
GTX 480M NVIDIA GTX 480M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4860 4860
GTX 480M NVIDIA GTX 480M
vs
8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 GS Rev. 3

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.